1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, Defendant B shall make a full registration office of the Gwangju District Court on August 2008.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 14, 2008, No. 16152 received on August 14, 2008, as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, owned by the Plaintiff, the provisional registration of the right to claim transfer of ownership in the name of Defendant B was completed on August 13, 2008 (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”).

B. On October 5, 2015, Defendant Republic of Korea seized the right to claim ownership transfer against the Plaintiff listed in the provisional registration of this case as a creditor holding a tax claim against Defendant B, and the seizure registration was recorded in the register on October 7, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, Eul Nos. 1-2 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The registration of seizure conducted as part of the disposition on default under the National Tax Collection Act was paid in arrears unless there is any ground that the seizure disposition is invalid as a matter of course.

or upon the expiration of the statute of limitations, or upon the completion of the

Even if an administrative agency's cancellation of attachment and cancellation of attachment can only be cancelled by the commission of registration attached to the report of cancellation of attachment, it asserts that the request for cancellation by civil action is unlawful.

However, the instant lawsuit is not an action against Defendant Republic of Korea seeking implementation of the procedure for cancellation registration of the registration of cancellation of the provisional registration of this case under Defendant B’s name, which is the subject of seizure, but an action seeking the consent’s statement against Defendant Republic of Korea against the cancellation of the provisional registration of this case under the name of Defendant B, who is an interested party on the registry, and is obligated to accept the registration of cancellation of the provisional registration of this case. Thus, the prior defense of Defendant Republic of Korea was derived from erroneous understanding

3. In the determination of the merits, the right of the contractor to the effect of the sale by declaring his/her intention of the completion of the contract, i.e., the reservation.