1. The Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gahap1049 decided on the acquisition amount between the Korea Asset Management Corporation and the Defendants.

1. On September 18, 2012, the Plaintiff’s indication of the claim filed a claim with the Korea Asset Management Corporation on the ground that the Plaintiff acquired the claim based on a final and conclusive judgment of the Seoul Central District Court 2008Gahap10049 between the Korea Asset Management Corporation and the Defendants (the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the fact of transferring the claim on January 12, 2017, after being delegated with the Korea Asset Management Corporation with the authority to notify the assignment of the claim from the Korea Asset Management Corporation at the time of the acquisition of the claim, but the notification of the assignment of the claim was not possible to prove necessary for the grant of the succession execution clause because the notification of the assignment of claim did not reach

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).