logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.10.25 2015가단241538
임금
Text

1. Defendant B’s 12,596,666 won and the interest rate of 15% per annum from December 23, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. (1) The Defendants asserted as to the agreement with the Defendants as follows.

(1) The agreement asserted in paragraph (1) is limited to a criminal complaint against the defendant C, and is subject to the resolution of related issues, such as wages, etc. against the plaintiff. Since the defendants made the plaintiff prepare by using the fact that the plaintiff lacks intellectual ability, the agreement is null and void by Article 104 of the Civil Act.

(2) The Defendants asserted on the merits (A) had the Plaintiff work as a entertainment entertainment tavern operated by the Defendants from November 11, 201 to January 27, 2014, and had the Plaintiff work as a entertainment loan for 26.5 months from January 27, 2014, and did not pay the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 31,750,000, excluding the amount of KRW 4,750,000,000, which was paid by the Defendants on behalf of the Defendants, excluding the amount of KRW 1,00,00,000, based on the rate of KRW 1,000 per month from January 11, 201 to January 27, 2014

At least, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the remaining 12,596,666 won, excluding the above 4,750,000 won among the above 17,346,666 won per month recognized by the Defendants during the above period.

(B) The Defendants committed a tort against the Plaintiff to have the Plaintiff engage in sexual traffic at the massage place operated by the Defendants from April 2012 to June 2012, 2012, and thus, jointly and severally liable to pay 10,000,000 won to the Plaintiff.

B. (1) On September 29, 2014, the Plaintiff had to file a civil or criminal objection with respect to D entertainment tavern instead of receiving KRW 2,00,000 from the Defendants on September 29, 2014, and thus, the Plaintiff’s lawsuit of this case must be dismissed.

(2) The Defendants asserted on the merits do not recognize that the Plaintiff had worked as an employee in the DD entertainment tavern, and against the matters alleged by the Plaintiff as follows.

(A) Defendant B paid all wages of KRW 700,000 per month to the Plaintiff in cash.

(B) The Defendants are the Defendants.

arrow