logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원장흥지원 2020.12.24 2020고단270
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 4, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 7 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's support for the promotion of the head of Gwangju District Court on three occasions in total.

【Criminal Facts】

On October 11, 2020, the Defendant driven a low-speed car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.087% from the front of the C convenience store to the front of the D Building E-dong parking lot at approximately 500 meters.

Accordingly, the defendant violated his duty not to drive alcohol more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, and report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Before ruling: Application of criminal history records, reply reports, investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is to increase the risk of citizens' traffic safety and thus, the necessity of strict punishment is high, and the defendant separates his fault, and the sentencing balance with the criminal records of the defendant, the criminal records of the defendant, the criminal records, the background of the crime, the degree of taking the principal, the defendant's age, family relationship, health status and the possibility of recidivism are determined by comprehensively taking account of the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of the case.

arrow