beta
Text
Defendant
A A A The fine of KRW 2.5 million, the Defendant B’s fine of KRW 3.5 million, the Defendant C’s fine of KRW 3.5 million.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
C is the agent of the president of the L Transport Business Association M&A located on the second floor of the building of the member-gu K Maintenance Factory in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant B is the representative of the above union. Defendant A is the vice-chairperson of the above union, Defendant D, Defendant H, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G are the members of the above union.
On December 1, 2007, the victim N was elected as the president of the partnership, but on September 28, 2010, by the defendant A, etc. who was a representative at the time of the above association's provisional meeting, the resolution of dismissal of the president of the association against the victim was made at the above association's provisional meeting of the association. Accordingly, on July 22, 2011, the victim filed a lawsuit to seek confirmation of invalidity of the above dismissal resolution with the Suwon District Court's assistance, and on July 22, 2011, the Seoul High Court announced the plaintiff's favorable decision (the above court's judgment 2010Na10293, the majority general meeting of councillors, and the confirmation of existence of the above association's general meeting of councillors). On September 23, 2011, the above provisional disposition was announced to the above court's provisional disposition that the N et al. should not obstruct the entry of the association's office (the above court's provisional disposition No. 20140,010
However, despite the above Seoul High Court's decision to nullify the dismissal of the Defendants and the above Seoul High Court's decision to prohibit the obstruction of the duties of the Suwon District Court, the Defendants denied the status of the victim's president as the president of the partnership on the grounds that the above dismissal decision is pending in the Supreme Court's decision, and had the intent to prevent the victim from entering the association office of this case in order to carry out its duties as the president
1. Defendants C, B, Defendant A, Defendant D, Defendant H, and Defendant E’s joint criminal conduct are around 11:30 on October 10, 201.