logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.04.05 2016가단210629
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 282,318,222 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from October 16, 2013 to April 5, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 16, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) requested the Defendant’s D Factory located in Sejong-si to remove a boomer, which had already existed in the supply platform, to supply fruit to the Defendant’s D Factory located in Sejong-si; and (b) manufactured, installed, and remodeled the hub equipment at the Defendant’s D plant, to make it possible to start the supply cost without the mother.

B. The Plaintiff requested the head of the public service team in charge of the Defendant’s facilities to block electricity and air, and cut off about 10 minutes after checking the commencement of the work, and confirmed whether the work was done through electric wires and started work.

C. Upon the Plaintiff’s request for the movement of the transit space, the Defendant left the transit space to which the Plaintiff was working on the work site, and he stored two parts on the side of the lane supply unit, without cutting the fruit connected to the machine strawing machine, which was connected to the strawing machine.

Although the plaintiff requested cutting of excessive fishing for the convenience of the work, the defendant refused to use the excessive language that is left to the public when cutting excessive fishing.

E. Meanwhile, the authorized establishment is regulated at the location of the station installed in the supply unit, and the location of the establishment is possible even if the supply of the supply of the supplier is prevented because it is subject to a separate supply of electricity through the authorized establishment panel, thereby blocking the supply of the supplier.

The Defendant’s employees E prevented only the supply of electricity by suppliers due to lack of knowledge of such fact, and the Plaintiff’s Domine, who operated the power plant for the reason of an influence, and was in excess of the Domine and was shocked by the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident.” The overburine breadthed around 120 cm in diameter and approximately 100 cm in height, weighted around 2.5 metric tons.

F. The Plaintiff was involved in the instant accident.

arrow