Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged: (a) around October 24, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s left side her part at the right hand room, namely, that the Defendant had talked in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and the “C convenience store” in front of the “C convenience store,” and had talked with E and her to talk with the victim.
2. We examine the judgment, and the facts charged pertaining to the crime as provided by Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
However, according to the records, on February 19, 2019, after the prosecution of this case, it is clear that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant. Thus, the prosecution against the defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.