logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.08.12 2011고단2786
정치자금법위반
Text

1. Defendant O, R, and AE are punished by fine of 300,00 won, Defendant E, F, H, H, J, K, L, M, M, N, P, Q, AJ, S, T, U,K, V, W, X, Y, and Z.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No teacher of a national or public school who is a State public official shall support any specific political party or political organization with money or material for political purposes, whatever the pretext it is.

In addition, anyone is prohibited from contributing any political fund by means that are not stipulated in the Political Funds Act, and anyone who intends to contribute any support fund to any political party before March 13, 2006 shall contribute any support fund to the supporters' association of the political party and shall not directly contribute any support fund to any political party, and from contributing any support fund to any political party from March 13, 2006, including the form in which the supporters' association is abolished, from March 13, 2006.

1. [Attachment 2011 Highest 2786] Defendant A is currently serving as a teacher of a national or public school who was appointed as a national or public public official on September 1, 1989 and is currently serving as a teacher of a A Q middle School.

On or before November 3, 2004, the Defendant applied for “the automatic payment through the Cmp transfer method” to the AR Party and applied for “the automatic payment through the Cmp transfer method” on or before July 26, 2006, and via the Cmp transfer method to intermediate the financial settlement center located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant indicated that the Defendant paid KRW 20,000,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural cooperative account to the AR account established at the KR branch located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. However, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant paid the “party membership fee” to the AR account. However, even if the Defendant recognized the said transfer name as “support fund” as above, it cannot be said that the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense, and thus, it should be recognized as a “party membership fee” under the name of support ex officio without changing the indictment.

(hereinafter the same is applicable to other Defendants). The political funds have been transferred under the pretext of transfer and contributed.

2. [Attachment 201 Highest 2789] Defendant C.

arrow