logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.07.20 2017고단549
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the “D” drinking house operated by the Victim C, which was located in Sinpo-si B on April 26, 2017; (b) while the Defendant’s drinking and flacing conflict with the Defendant, the Defendant destroyed three the teb, which was the victim’s possession.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim C’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) putting the Defendant at the time, time, place, and the Defendant’s conduct of the instant Claim No. 1; (b) putting the Defendant with a large voice “YYYYYY”; (c) cutting the tebbs to the tebs; (d) cutting the tebs to the tebs to the tebs; and (e) taking the ebs to the ebs to the ebs to the ebs to the ebs to the

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on damage scenes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has a history of criminal punishment on several occasions due to violence, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors for sentencing indicated in the record, including the fact that the amount of damage to property is a relatively small amount, the defendant confessions and reflects the instant crime, and the fact that the defendant agreed to do so by the victim.

arrow