logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.17 2016가합4315
용역대금
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 418,00,000 and the Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff, Defendant B from April 26, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company with the objective of engineering projects (survey, plan, design, construction project management, consultation, etc.), and environment assessment-related projects. Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a company with the objective of urban development projects, sales and sales agency business, etc.

B. On January 12, 2011, Defendant B entered into a technical service contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the Korea Urban Development Project Association (hereinafter “Association”) and the Korea Urban Development Project Association (hereinafter “instant project”). On January 12, 201, Defendant B entered into a technical service contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the Plaintiff with respect to technical services, including authorization of the instant project implementation plan.

The person ordering the technical service contract: The name of the Plaintiff: The total amount of the technical service contract, such as the authorization of the implementation plan for the Gyeonggi-do Urban Development Project: the amount of KRW 4,312,00,000,000 (4,312,000,000) for the contract period: The amount of value-added tax at the rate of price fluctuation, such as the unit wage for the engineer: the amount of KRW 3,920,000 during the contract period: the contract period of KRW 3,92,00,000,000 for the daily gold-gu, KRW 392,000 (3,00,000): The location from the contract date to the public announcement date of the replotting disposition after the completion of the construction: This contract is for Article 3 (Scope of Services) of the General Conditions for the E-Japan Technology Service Contract at the time of racing, which is for the business purpose of the Defendant B (the Plaintiff of this case) to efficiently perform the technical service, thereby promoting the business.

1. Location: E won in racing;

2. Area: A land substitution plan for various procedures under relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as air surveys for the scope of an implementation plan for the division of 1,104,305 square meters, the formulation of Class I district unit planning, soil surveys (NX60), the civil engineering basic and shop design (including electrical facilities) and authorization, etc.;

arrow