The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant subscribed to each insurance policy through solicitation by the surrounding people and active telephone consultation by each insurance company; (b) the Defendant, at the time of signing each insurance policy, had sufficient means to pay each insurance premium with the income of the Defendant’s revenue, living together, and her children; (c) the Defendant was provided with surgery treatment, hospitalized treatment, and physical therapy at the same time before entering the instant hospital; (d) the Defendant was hospitalized in another hospital while hospitalized in the instant hospital, and (e) continued to have been hospitalized in the instant hospital; (b) the Defendant continued to have been hospitalized in the instant hospital and received the same conditions of hospital treatment and physical therapy in accordance with the opinion of the doctor in charge; (c) according to the examination of medical records, the period of hospitalization by the Defendant was somewhat long-term opinion that some of the Defendant was hospitalized in the instant hospital, or that there was considerable change in the medical knowledge and experience of the doctor in charge, and that there was considerable change in the content of the instant hospital’s health care at the time of the hospital.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case and erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant purchased the Victim Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance (U.S.) (U.S.) insurance around March 21, 2007 as well as five domestic private insurance companies.