1. The Defendant calculated each of the Plaintiffs with 25,00,000 won and 12% per annum from July 5, 2019 to the day of complete payment.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff A is the owner of the land in Chuncheon City D (hereinafter “instant land”).

Plaintiff

B is the spouse of the Plaintiff A.

The defendant is a company that constructs electric installations of solar power plants.

B. On October 23, 2017, the Plaintiffs concluded a contract with the Defendant to install solar power plants on the instant land (hereinafter “instant contract”) respectively.

The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.

Construction amount: The first progress payment of KRW 25 million (after the completion of a contract): 39 million: (B) the first progress payment of KRW 39 million (before the issuance of a certificate of permission for development acts; Before the supply of equipment and materials): The remainder of KRW 70 million (after the progress of development activities process 30%): the cost determined separately from the contract amount under the condition that the payment is made, separately from the contract amount of the civil engineering design cost, civil engineering construction cost, farmland conversion cost, forest research cost, forest land supply cost, connections survey, cadastral boundary survey, various development boundary survey, water supply cost, electricity power plant-related construction cost, construction cost (such as electric power plant-related design cost), construction cost (such as electric power plant-related design cost), construction cost (such as building cost), solar-related construction cost, solar-related construction cost, solar-related construction cost, and ground-related construction cost (after the completion of construction works), construction cost of this case: The content included in the contract amount of electric installation-related construction cost of this case;

1. The defendant may have a joint executor.

2. In executing this contract, matters concerning civil petitions shall be treated respectively by the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, and the cost-generating portion shall be resolved through mutual consultation and shall be liable when damage occurs.

3. All of the provisions of the contract are the premise that the plaintiffs can enter the RPS system and carry out the business. The defendant is related to the bidding or over-the-counter trading including the RPS-related business.