logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.06.02 2015가단8863
배당이의
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 15, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Daegu District Court for a seizure and collection order with respect to the claim for the return of the lease deposit held by the KFE against the KFE (hereinafter “CFE”) based on the executory exemplification of the judgment claiming damages, etc. in claim for damages, etc. from the said court. On the 19th of the same month, the Plaintiff received the order for the seizure and collection of the said claim from the said court.

(F) Daegu District Court Branch 2014Tari2137).(b)

In addition, on July 21, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for a seizure and collection order with respect to the claim for the return of forest damage compensation deposit against the Association of Korea, and the claim for the return of lease deposit against the Association of Korea Indeption Institute based on the executory exemplification of the authentication document in the case No. 127 of the Daegu District Court case No. 127 on July 21, 2014. On the 18th of the same month, the Plaintiff received a seizure and collection order with the same content from the above court.

(F) Daegu District Court Branch 2014TTTTT 3686, c)

On February 12, 2015, the Defendants prepared a notarial deed of debt repayment contract (No. 1-3, 2015; hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) with the purport that “The unpaid wages against the Defendants are KRW 164,00,000 for Defendant A, KRW 62,000 for Defendant B, KRW 82,80,000 for Defendant C, and KRW 82,80,000 for Defendant C to repay the unpaid wages until March 10, 2015” from E, and has the same year.

4. On the basis of each of the above notarial deeds, the Daegu District Court branch branch offices issued a collection and seizure order and collection order, respectively, against the claims to return the deposit for lease deposit to E in order to collect the deposit for lease deposit.

(F) The Daegu District Court Branch Branch 2015TTT1844, 2015TTT1845, 2015TTT1845, 2015TTT1846, and hereinafter “the collection order for each of the claims of this case”).

The Cuksung District Court deposited the lease deposit with the Daegu District Court Mapo-gu 887 in 2015.

hereinafter referred to as "the case."

arrow