beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 73,657,50 to the Plaintiff the annual rate of KRW 15% from January 27, 2015 to the date of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. In the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese Occupation Period, C’s address in Suwon-gun B is indicated as being examined by the fact that it was 471 square meters prior to D, E, 714 square meters prior to E, and F, 199 square meters prior to F (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).
B. Since then, the land of this case was changed to the land of this case, which is 1,557 square meters in Pyeongtaek-si D, E, 2,360 square meters in total, and 658 square meters in F-do (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”; when one of them is named, the registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea was completed on February 13, 2009, and the title holder on the land cadastre is H in the case of the instant land G, and in the case of the instant land E, the title holder on the land cadastre is H in the case of the instant land.
C. Each of the instant lands is indicated as river areas on the copy of the river maintenance master plan of J River in 1979 and the copy of the river master plan of the I Basic River in 2014, as land that is incorporated into and managed by the Seoul Regional Land Management Office, which is a national river.
On March 2, 1946, the Plaintiff’s fleet C died on March 2, 194, and C died first of all, and L, the head of K, a South-North Korea, independently inherited Australia and inherited property. After the death of April 6, 1990, the agreement was reached between the Plaintiff, M, N, andO on the share of inheritance with the content that the Plaintiff inherited each of the instant land by himself.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 7 through 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a land under the circumstances of C, which is the part of the Plaintiff’s expansion, and is owned by the State, and thus, the Defendant is deemed to have been incorporated into a river area of I, and thus, the Special Measures Act on the Compensation, etc. for Land Incorporated into Rivers (hereinafter