logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2016.03.25 2015허5692
거절결정(특)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The name of the invention claimed in this case (Evidence 1 and 2) 1: B2: the filing date/application number: the applicant: Plaintiff 4) claims (amended by March 23, 2015) 【 Claim 1】 (hereinafter referred to as components 1); (a) the information on order is entered from the purchaser; (b) the order page in which the information on order is entered is stored in URL (hereinafter referred to as “requirements 2”); and (c) the order page in which the order page is sent to the buyer as a short-term buyer; (d) the order page in which the URL is sent to the buyer; and (e) the order page in which the order page is sent to the buyer; (e) the order page in which the settlement is sent to the purchaser at least one settlement page corresponding to the URL; and (e) the order page in which the settlement component is provided to the purchaser at least five separate settlement pages (hereinafter referred to as “voluntary settlement component 4; and (e) the settlement component is provided to the purchaser at least one settlement page 1.

B. Prior Inventions 1) Prior Inventions 1 (No. 5) relating to the "other person's vicarious settlement system in IPTV shopping mall" published on February 6, 2009, as stated in Article 10-2009-14002 of the Patent Gazette, and its main contents and main drawings are as follows. 2) Prior Inventions 2 (Evidence 6) of the Patent Gazette published on June 13, 2013, relating to the "information processing method, system and recording medium" published on June 13, 2013, and the main contents and main contents thereof.

arrow