Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, as to the Defendants for one year from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On November 25, 2014, the Seoul District Court was sentenced to one year of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 3, 2014.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 22, 2014, the Defendant found one motor vehicle owned by the victim F, which was located after the base of the river, within the first male toilet of the E Hospital located in Dong in the Jeon-Eup, Jung-gu, Chungcheongnam-do around the new wall on November 22, 2014.

The Defendant did not follow necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

B. On November 22, 2014, the Defendant was driving a G car owned by the said F without obtaining a driver’s license from the front parking lot of the E Hospital located in the Si/Yeong-Eup, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, the front of the new wall, to the entrance of the Young-si, the Young-si, the Chungcheongnam-si, the Chungcheongnam-si, the Chungcheongnam-si, the front of which is located in the Si/Yeong-si, the

2. On November 22, 2014, Defendant B driven a G car owned by the said F without obtaining a driver’s license from the entrance of the Changbuk-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, to the entrance of the E Hospital located in the Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

3. On November 22, 2014, the Defendants discovered a Gsti-type car owned by the victim F, which was parked in the parking lot located in the front of the E Hospital located in the front of the new hospital in the front of the Dong-Eup, Chungcheongnam-do. As referred to in paragraph 1(a) of the above, the Defendants driven the said vehicle without the victim’s consent by using the vehicle height acquired by the Defendant A, as set forth in paragraph 1(a) of the above, and drive the said vehicle again to the said Esti-type parking lot located in the Dong-dong, Si-gu, Si-Eup.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use the said vehicle temporarily without the consent of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. A previous conviction in judgment: