Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against himself/herself; (b) there has been no past history of punishment until now; (c) the degree of injury of the victims is relatively weak; (d) the distance from driving alcohol is not long; (b) the Defendant wants the Defendant’s wife by mutual consent with the victims; (c) the Defendant has received mental treatment with alcohol; (d) the Defendant has been receiving hospitalized treatment; and (e) the Defendant has not committed the same crime again after being hospitalized; (c) the Defendant supports his/her wife and his/her parents; (d) the Defendant is the most supporting the Defendant’s wife and his/her family members; and (e) the Defendant’s family and family members want to have the Defendant’s wife against him/her; and (e) the Defendant

However, even though the Defendant had been punished twice due to drinking driving (two times a fine) and one time a refusal to measure drinking (one time a suspended sentence), the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even during the suspended sentence period due to the same kind of crime, and the Defendant escaped without undergoing a warrant quality examination while being investigated and avoided criminal justice procedures, and comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other sentencing conditions, including the following circumstances, it is not recognized that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable to the extent that the sentence is reversed.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.