The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) stated in the printed article is not false.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the court below's duly adopted and examined. ① The victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, requested the defendant to recommend fire engines as fire engines, or introduced sand in C river to the public officials working in the budget-gun office, and there is no fact that the victim requested the defendant to move into the government office of the budget-gun, and ② The victim consistently made a statement to the purport that "the defendant did not have any reason to request the fund of KRW 2 million or KRW 3 million per household to move into the government office of the government office of the government," ② The victim was driving the truck while going into the government office of the government at the time of other work, and there was no large license necessary for carrying out fire-fighting engineer's work. ③ The victim's statement to the court below that the defendant did not have any reason to request the above recommendation, and the victim's statement to the public official of the government office of the government office of the government office of the government office of the government office of the government office of the government office of the local government."

J also, in the investigative agencies and the courts of the party consistently, the damaged person is expected to move into the village of electric power generation.