1. Masan-gun District Court Decision 399,571, which was deposited in gold No. 758 in 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 20, 2013, between the Plaintiff and Seoungung Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., the assignment of claims, which occurred on February 20, 2013, was awarded a contract for the small river maintenance works on the Donsan-gun.

On February 20, 2013, Hung Construction Co., Ltd. transferred to the Plaintiff the above claim for the construction cost to the Masan-gun of the Construction Co., Ltd. for the said construction cost (hereinafter “instant claim for the construction cost”). The notice of the assignment of the said claim to Gung-gun by content-certified mail was sent to Mung-gun on February 21, 2013.

B. In relation to the claim for the construction payment of this case, Matsan-gun deposited by Matsan-gun, the creditors of the Matsan-gun were served with the decision of seizure or provisional seizure of the above claim as shown below.

On April 4, 2013, the creditor's claim amount No. 285,291,736, Cheongju District Court Order No. 2013Tju District Court Order No. 15,015,355, Cheongju District Court Order No. 2013, Jun. 17, 2013; Defendant D 2,090,000, Cheongju District Court No. 2014, 2014, 7,713,71, 205, 203, 2014, 30, 205, 2014, 205, 2014, 37, 2014, 205, 205, 2014, 37, 2014, 15, 2014, 15, 2014, 205, 2014, 2014.

[Based on the recognition] As to the case of defendant corporation, the defendant corporation's assertion of confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act): The fact that there is no dispute as to defendant B, C, and D: the statement from Gap's evidence 1 to Gap's evidence 7 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. Determination as to the cause of the claim.