1. Defendant D, E, F, G, H, and I jointly and severally with the Plaintiff KRW 2,00,000,000, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of them.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A, Defendant D, and G are M High Schools located in Daegu Suwon-gu L at the time of 2012 (hereinafter “M High Schools”).

(1) The Defendants were students in the second and second years (hereinafter “Defendant students”).

(1) The Plaintiff, B, and C are the parents of the Plaintiff, and Defendant E and F are the parents of Defendant D, and Defendant H and I are the parents of Defendant G (hereinafter “Defendant students”).

(2) Defendant J was a teacher in the second half year as of 2012, and Defendant K was a principal of M High School.

B. On March 20, 2012, Defendant J received calls from Plaintiff C to report school violence from Plaintiff C, and from Defendant D to the police in question. 2) As such, Defendant J stated that Plaintiff A and Defendant D did not have any damage to Plaintiff A and Defendant D, and that Defendant D expressed the opinion on Plaintiff A’s assertion. The Plaintiff stated that Defendant D and Defendant B committed the same act as the fact of damage in the attached Form.

3) After that, Defendant J had an interview with Plaintiff A, Defendant D, and their parents, Plaintiff C, and Defendant F, and on March 28, 2012, Plaintiff A drafted a self-certification on the following: “I will accept the Defendant D’s apology, and confirm that any objection related to this work would not have been raised after this hour.” 4) Plaintiff A submitted a self-certificate to Ma High School on March 30, 2012, and written “A adaptation to school life.”

On April 27, 2012, M High Schools held the Autonomous Committee on School Violence against Defendant D in relation to the instant case, and the Autonomous Committee on School Violence decided that the instant case does not constitute school violence cases.

C. On May 1, 2012, Plaintiff A’s complaint and Plaintiff A’s disposition against Defendant students filed a complaint with Defendant D and G with an investigative agency, and Defendant D and G.