The defendant is 5% per annum from August 1, 2020 to March 11, 2021 to 5% per annum against each of the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs and the defendant are residents of Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

Plaintiff

A is a person elected by around 2008 as the representative of the first resident of the apartment of this case. The defendant is a person elected by the representative of the resident of the above apartment of this case around June 2018, and the plaintiff B and C are married couple.

나. 피고는 2019년 경 “ 피고가 2019. 5. 10. 경 서울 중랑구 상봉동에 있는 음식점에서 원고 B 등에게 사실은 원고 A, C이 불륜관계 인지에 대하여 명확하지 않고 증거사진이 없음에도 ‘ 원고 A, C이 바람을 펴서 F에서 팔짱 끼고 시장 보러 다닌다.

There is evidence photographs.

The honor of Plaintiff A and C was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

“The crime was prosecuted in summary as Seoul Northern District Court 2019 Highly 8478.

On September 9, 2019, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 300,000 to the defendant, and the above summary order was finalized around that time.

(c)

In around 2019, the Defendant filed a criminal complaint against the Plaintiffs for larceny on suspicion that “the Plaintiffs stolen the reputation owned by the above apartment in the guard room of the instant apartment,” with the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office, and the prosecutor in charge of larceny on January 13, 2020, the prosecutor in charge is recognized that the Plaintiffs brought ordinary reputation in the guard room of the instant apartment, but it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff was aware of the intention of larceny with the view to the fact that the said reputation is the object directly assembled and installed around September 28, 2008 by the Plaintiff A. In view of the fact that the Plaintiff was a object that was directly assembled and installed on September 28, 2008, it is difficult to deem that the intention of larceny was recognized with the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff B and C merely attempted to do so at the Plaintiff’s request.

“The Plaintiffs determined that they were not guilty (defluence of evidence) and rendered a non-prosecution disposition against the Plaintiffs.

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion spreads false facts that the plaintiffs A and C are in in in a bad faith relationship.