logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.09.22 2015노2213
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) although the Defendant correctly perceived the shock of the Defendant’s vehicle and the damaged vehicle, the Defendant left the scene of the accident while leaving the scene of the damaged vehicle after leaving the scene of the accident, although he was only Hanmadi, “I am Do’s fine”; and (b) the Defendant arbitrarily leaving the place of this case and left the scene of the accident; and (c) the Defendant appears to have concealed the Defendant, in light of the location and time of the accident at the time of the accident, and the vehicle flow would not have a big flow; and (d) there was a danger and obstacle to traffic due to the attack of the victim; (e) even if it was necessary to take measures to prevent and remove traffic hazards and obstacles at the time to ensure safe and smooth flow of traffic, the Defendant could be found to have intentionally deserted the scene of the accident without complying with this, but otherwise, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. ① The traffic accident of this case is merely a flick part of the damaged vehicle's front corner of the driver's seat of the defendant's vehicle, which was driven by the defendant's vehicle on the two-lane road along the two-lane road, and thus, it is very minor that the damage is caused and that the flick part is not scattered on the road from the defendant's vehicle and the damaged vehicle. ② The "on-site traffic-traffic interference" column of the de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto, and ③ immediately after the occurrence of the traffic accident of this case, the defendant stopped after the vehicle parked on the two-lane road and stopped on the one-lane side of the defendant's vehicle.

arrow