A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

. The rent shall be paid after the end of three months, and the construction shall be completed at the time of the completion of the construction, and the additional rent shall be paid at the end of the following month on the 15th of the following month.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not receive the pre-paid construction cost under the circumstances where the Defendant owed 15 million won and 15 million won in arrears to the card payment and the 15 million won in arrears without any particular income or property, and did not have any intention or ability to return the leased construction materials to the victim as well as there was no intention or ability to properly pay the rent even if the Defendant leased the construction materials from the injured party without any specific financial financing plan.

On August 20, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained delivery of the sum of 24,145,000 won of the market value of 17 items, including about 4,145,00 won of the erop (6012), 60 erop (5012), 90 erop (3012), 60 erop (100*100), 60 erop (100 erop) erop (1.2m), 100 erop (4m) from the injured party.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 118" is a person who has worked as a manager at the construction site of the Army BOP fence of the victim's Docian company (the State).

On November 1, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I” restaurant located in Yang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, Yang-gu, Gangwon-do, paid vehicle maintenance costs and equipment loans to K, individual cargo, and comprehensive maintenance center in relation to the said construction.”

However, the defendant not only did not have paid the vehicle maintenance cost, but also when receiving the above money from the victim, he thought that it would be used as a separate construction fund and living cost irrelevant to the victim.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim and deceivings the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day as the vehicle maintenance cost, etc.