1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from November 2, 2013 to January 14, 2015, and the following.

1. Recognition of liability for damages;

A. 1) D is based on the basis of liability: (a) the E Inscarlet (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 12:50 on November 2, 2013;

) While driving a vehicle and driving a two-lane road in front of 550, 200, 550, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 200,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff entered the location where the instant accident occurred, which is a crosswalk of four-lane pedestrian signals, in an unreasonable way, even though such pedestrian signal was red, and did not properly examine the traffic situation of the vehicle driving along the crosswalk. The Plaintiff’s negligence is deemed to have caused the instant accident and the damages to be increased; and (b) in full view of all the circumstances, the Plaintiff’s negligence is limited to 55% of the Defendant’s liability by taking into account the Plaintiff’s negligence into account as 45% when considering all the circumstances, including the fact that D was in the state of 0.025% alcohol concentration at the time of the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for evidence Nos. 12 and 13) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Except as otherwise stated below, 5/12 per month and 5/12 per month in the annexed sheet of calculation of damages.