The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant obtained salt production permission on salt before being the subject of the instant crime and resolved its illegality.

However, the crime of this case is that the Defendant produced salt without permission in a salt farm with a size of 15,868 square meters for three months or more, and such crime is not less complicated in light of the size of salt farms or the quantity of produced salt.

In addition, even though the defendant had been already punished once by committing the same crime in the same salt farm, he again committed the crime of this case.

In full view of all such circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and sentencing of similar cases as indicated in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is only within the scope of reasonable discretion and is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.