(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.05.25 2017고단2568

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.05.25 2017고단2568

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2017 Highest 2568]

1. On March 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20 on the ground that he/she performed construction work without paying the construction cost required by the victim E (51) who is the contractor of the construction work; (b) the victim and his/her name and infinite body, etc. found the above construction site during the work; (c) expressed the victim’s desire to be “new, Chewing finite” in large sounds; (d) cut off the electric wires installed on the rooftop of the building using his/her major pen; (e) cut off four steel structures installed on the rooftop of the building using the oxygen cutting machine; and (e) interfered with the operation of the said site by sealed the back part of the premium vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's facility construction work by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place described in paragraph 1, cutting off the electric wires installed on the rooftop of a building with a major gate as described in paragraph 1, was located on the floor of the site. The Defendant, the Victim F (24 Does) who was on the floor of the site, changed the major pent, changed the pent, and the bacle “Is the bato bom.”

Around 4-5 meters of a victim who had been under approximately 4-5 meters, and had the victim wear the above major pen, and assaulted the victim by leading the victim to the back.

[2017 Highest 3795] The Defendant: (a) on March 1, 2017, from around 14:00 to around 17:00, the Kimhae-si; (b) on the ground that the Victim E (51) who is the said contractor (51) did not pay the construction cost as required and the Defendant is performing the construction; (c) on the ground that there is a hearing of the parts, such as the victim, G, and H, of the said contractor; (d) on the ground that the said construction contractor did not pay the construction cost; (d) on the ground that there is a hearing of the parts, such as

b) why the payment of money was made;

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the large sound called “sark, sark, and sark.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2018.10.17 2018노1351

-의정부지방법원 2020.01.30 2019나3906

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.10.17 2018고단2809

-제주지방법원 2014.01.28 2013고정1029