logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.05 2011고정6867
명예훼손
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. On May 31, 201, the Defendants’ co-principal drawing in Jongno-gu Seoul Council asked the victims of G to engage in an unlawful sexual intercourse at the time of his meeting, or to engage in a cruel act against the pastors, and Defendant B had 80 people attending the meeting, so far as he did not have a sexual intercourse. It would be possible to find out that he had a son’s nomenclature and sexual intercourse. It would be possible to say that he had a son’s nomenclature, who had been sexual intercourse. It would be possible to see that he had a son’s nomenclature and a woman’s nomenclature, and that he had a nomenclature. It would be possible to see that he had a son’s nomenclature, so far as he had a nomenclature and had a nomenclature.

In addition, it has been extremely bad that he wanted to build his body, and he has married to the G Grgrgrgr, Krgrgrging.

arrow