beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (legal scenarios and unreasonable sentencing)
A. The victim of the misapprehension of the legal principle as to self-defense is a patient with a mental fluordy fydy and mental fluor, such as that he was sentenced to a 13-year punishment for the crime of murder and that he does not promnize the fact that he was dead, etc., and the defendant constitutes self-defense since the victim experienced a threat to the victim's life and used a minimum amount of violence
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court of first instance which convicted the defendant is erroneous in the misunderstanding of legal principles as to self-defense, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
B. The punishment sentenced by the first instance court of unfair sentencing (fine 200,000) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The first instance court held that the Defendant’s act did not meet the requirements of self-defense and sentenced the Defendant to a guilty verdict on the grounds that the Defendant’s act did not constitute self-defense, taking full account of the facts and circumstances established by the evidence duly admitted and investigated.
A thorough review by comparing the first instance judgment with the records. A thorough examination is conducted between the persons who conduct the same fighting, and the first instance judgment is acceptable, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as alleged by the Defendant, since the act of attack and the defense was conducted simultaneously between the persons who conduct the same fighting, and it is hard to view that the act of this case is "political act" or "self-defense" for the purpose of defense by leaving only one of the acts of the parties concerned, and (2) there is no ground to regard the act of this case as an act of considerable nature, in light of the background leading up to the trial between the Defendant and the victim, the means and degree of harm done by the victim to the Defendant, the means and method of the compared act of the Defendant, and the result of the act, etc.