Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 2, 2012, the Plaintiff, a company running a construction business, etc., changed its trade name from January 2, 201 to the current company for the housing construction.
B. From around 2004, the Plaintiff planned a housing construction project with regard to the area of 18 lots of land (hereinafter “instant project site”) and the area of 232-21 square meters and 18 lots of land (hereinafter “instant project site”).
C. On November 29, 2004, the Plaintiff submitted an application for approval of the housing construction project plan for the instant project site (hereinafter “application for approval”) to the Defendant, and attached a written statement of gratuitous reversion stating that “A public facilities, such as roads, newly installed with respect to the size of 1,497 square meters, from among the size of 1,777 square meters in Gyeyang-si, Madg-si, Madg-si, Madg-si, Madg-si, Madg-si, Madg-si, Madg-si,
After that, on April 13, 2005, there was a division of 232-107 square meters per annum in the area of 8,777 square meters per annum in the area of Mangyeong-si, Magpo-ri 232-107 square meters per annum.
E. On September 23, 2005, the Defendant sent a public letter to the Plaintiff stating that “The Plaintiff expressed his/her intention to donate land and obstacles included in the construction section of the road (ro 2-4) that is promoted by the Defendant to be donated to the Plaintiff as to the land and obstacles, etc. to be incorporated into the construction section of the road (ro 2-4) and so, he/she asked the Plaintiff whether he/she has been using the land and obstacles, etc. on the land of 232-106 square meters prior to 232-106 square meters prior to 232-107 square meters prior to 232-107 square meters prior to 232-107 square meters prior to
F. On October 5, 2005, the Plaintiff cannot contribute land owned by the Plaintiff and obstacles included in the urban planning road (ro 2-4) construction section to the Defendant on October 5, 2005, and actively cooperate with the Defendant in compensation for land costs and obstacles, etc.
G. After that, the plaintiff delivered his intention that it is difficult to approve the project without accepting the donation of the land of this case from the defendant, and on March 17, 2006, the plaintiff sent his intention to the defendant that it is difficult to approve the project.