beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two and half years, and by imprisonment for a period of three and half years, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor and four years of suspended execution by the Jeonju District Court on July 9, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 2015.
[Criminal facts]
1. On October 17, 2013, the Defendants’ fraud against the Victim F at the former branch of the Bank of North Korea located in Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, and to the Victim F, “In the event a loan is made under the name of aner, the Defendants would receive a successful bid for the building of the convalescent hospital and offer the proceeds of KRW 2,00,000 per month to the Victim F.
“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the Defendants did not have any particular property, and the minimum bid price of the building in the convalescent hospital is about KRW 1.2 billion, and the bid bond is required, while the above money was not borrowed from other people, and even if they received money from the damaged person as a pretext of investment, they did not have any intent or ability to receive the above convalescent building or to pay the profit to the injured person.
Nevertheless, the Defendants, as seen above, obtained a false statement from the victim, and acquired it by deceptioning KRW 15 million from the former bank, KRW 10 million from the former bank, KRW 60 million from the former bank, KRW 60 million from the latter bank, and KRW 31 million from the latter bank.
2. Fraud against a lending company, etc. by a victim;
A. On October 16, 2013, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that the G Handphone agent located in the Jeonsan-si, Jeonju-si, the Defendants, “I would like to open a cell phone in the name of F because I would obtain consent from F because I would like to open a cell phone in the name of F.”
However, the Defendants did not have obtained consent from F to the opening of the mobile phone.
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to make a false statement to the victim as above, and the victim's cell phone (H) with an amount equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,163,00 from the victim.