1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A (Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, and G) from March 1, 2006 to March 1, 2006, the head of a cooperative of AP livestock industry cooperatives located in NamNO (hereinafter “AP livestock cooperative”), Defendant B, from September 1, 201 to September 1, 201, was the head of the AP livestock industry cooperation division and the consulting team, Defendant D, from around April 2009 to around July 31, 201, were the persons who were working as the head of the AP livestock industry consultation team from July 2008 to August 31, 201; Defendant F, from around July 1, 201, were the persons who were engaged in the transportation of the AP livestock industry division and the head of the AP livestock industry division and the head of the consulting team, Defendant D, from around 208 to around 31, 201 to the date of dismantling the cattle slaughtered, Defendant G, who was raising Q and selling the cattle at the time.

1. Fraud;

A. Since 2009, the AP Livestock Cooperative, which was a member of the Association, has entrusted the raising of Korea-China (S) to AR, AS, and AT, and slaughtered and shipped it.

AU, a general business director of the AP livestock industry, takes advantage of the fact that friendships entrusted with AP livestock farming consultation are subscribed to a livestock mutual aid association administered by the victim Nonghyup Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd., and receive insurance proceeds in the event of an emergency slaughter or waste death, etc., pretends to be non-non-permanent cattle due to a normal charnel, etc., and prepares a false certificate of sale as if they were sold at a lower price than the market price for emergency slaughter, and makes a prior report to the purport that they are entitled to receive insurance proceeds by receiving a false certificate of diagnosis from a veterinarian who did not directly diagnose the disease or injury of the pertinent lawsuit (emergency slaughter insurance proceeds). The AU, a general business director of the AP livestock industry, takes the following instructions to the effect that Defendant A, a subordinate employee, Defendant D, Defendant E, and livestock product shipping business operators, takes the same instructions, and sells livestock products at a place other than the permitted place of work, and thereafter, the relevant lawsuit was sold at the store operated by the AP livestock industry.