beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
The above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A appeared as a witness of the violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry (No. 599) at the court of Chuncheon District Court No. 301, which was located in 149, from October 19, 2017, around 15:30, 15:30, 149, Defendant A attended as a witness of the case of violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry (No. 599) at the court of F and B.
Defendant
A In testimony after taking an oath as above, the public prosecutor’s “the witness has not received money from F”
I cannot answer the question "..."
“I have made a statement” and “I have received the foregoing gold at that time.”
Other than money changers도요
The 17th day is charged with the question "....................."
“Statement”, and the presiding judge’s statement “Is no more than once the exchanged fact”
“Top.” was written as “top.”.
However, on November 17, 2016, Defendant A received 500,000 won from F in cash from “G”, which was operated by B and F, and 450,000 won in money. In addition, on October 20, 2016, Defendant A received 200,000 won in the game in cash from B and F. In addition, on October 20, 2016, Defendant A received 6-7 occasions in the game of this case, such as raising 10% of commission and receiving 180,00 won in cash.
Accordingly, Defendant A made a false statement contrary to his memory and presented perjury.
2. Defendant B is the president of the domestic game shop in the coffee shop located in the franchisium in order to the police officer in the middle of October 2017.
At the time of legal testimony, there is a difference in the statement favorable to the head of our game room. At the same time, 930,000 won occurs in the video, and at the same time, she decided that A would make a false statement contrary to his/her memory in the court, with the purport that “I would like to make a statement that would be equivalent to his/her memory, not to make a exchange.” Accordingly, A made a false statement after taking an oath at the court as above.
Accordingly, Defendant B made a false statement against his memory.