1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of three thousand won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person engaged in agriculture, such as cultivating math in the farmland located in Jeonbuk-gun E and F (hereinafter “the farmland of this case”). Defendant B provided the farmland of this case to Defendant A by leasing the farmland of this case from G, the landowner of this case, and provided it to Defendant A with monetary support, etc., and then received a subsidy for the green-math cultivation business from the head of the relevant water group, the settlement is made by dividing the subsidy. Defendant C is a post facto distribution of the farmland of this case, and Defendant C did not participate in the natural-math cultivation in the farmland of this case at all.

In May 2015 to December 12, 2015, the head of Suwon-gun implemented the "Faman Agricultural Promotion Project for New Growth" with the provision of local subsidies funded by military expenses for the cultivation of four items, such as Mama, etc., while limiting eligibility for support to the "Faman-gun" to the "Faman-gun, whose domicile is the head of Si/Gun, and the actual farmer (Yama, Baman, Sami, Sami, and general producer)" and limited to the scope of eligibility for support to the "Faman-gun, who is the head of Si/Gun, and the total project cost shall be borne by

Nevertheless, the Defendants agreed to receive local subsidies by filing a false application as if Defendant C, who was neither the actual farmer nor the self-paid charges, leased the farmland of this case and cultivated it.

Accordingly, on April 29, 2015, Defendant A prepared an application for a new growth agriculture support project and a business plan in the name of Defendant B’s “I real estate consulting office” in the name of the “I real estate consulting office located in the North Korea-gun.” On the same day, Defendant B transferred 45 million won from his account under the name of his wife to his wife (K) in order to pretend that Defendant C holds the balance of the treasury contribution account, which is at least 9,3160,000 won necessary for Defendant C’s application for a subsidy, from his account under the name of his wife, and leased the farmland of this case from the owner G.