1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was established on December 15, 199, and was engaged in the manufacture and sale of eggs, internal clothing, and clothing, etc., and was dissolved pursuant to Article 520-2(1) of the Commercial Act on December 5, 201.

B. From 2004 to 2006, the Defendants received a tax invoice in the name of the Plaintiff in relation to the transaction with another transaction partner, not the Plaintiff, and reported it to the tax office.

Defendant Company 1 B G 2C H 3D I 4 E J

C. Around August 2006, Echeon Tax Office issued 45 copies of the false sales tax invoice of KRW 1,336,431,00 in total without supplying goods or services under the Value-Added Tax Act from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005, and received 29 copies of the false purchase tax invoice of KRW 1,540,648,000 from five companies, including L, etc., for the same period, by which K received 29 copies of the false purchase tax invoice of KRW 1,540,648,00 from five companies, including L, etc.

The branch office of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office held that the statute of limitations on September 23, 201 was expired as of December 30, 201, after taking charge of this case and conducting an investigation, and rendered a disposition that has no jurisdiction to prosecute on the ground that the statute of limitations expired as of December 30, 2010.

Seoul District Prosecutors' Office 201No. 24991. D.

On August 18, 2006, while conducting a tax investigation, the director of the tax office ex officio closes down the business in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations and cancelled the business registration on the grounds that the plaintiff's head office does not actually operate the business as a suspect of material facts.

E. On August 21, 2006, the chief of the regional tax office, at the request of K by the representative director of the Plaintiff, voluntarily closed the business and cancelled the registration of the business.

on November 29, 2006, K applied for the revocation of the ex officio closure of business in the Leecheon Tax Office, and on December 18, 2006, the head of Leecheon Tax Office restored the business registration of the Plaintiff's head office.

F. Since then, K has reported the closure of its business on March 9, 2007 to the Plaintiff’s headquarters.