The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the period of the same repeated crime even though there are many persons who were punished for the same kind of crime, and did not take any particular measures to recover damage to an unspecified number of victims for a considerable period of time, the instant crime was committed repeatedly for an unspecified number of victims, and there is no special change in the nature of the crime, and there is no special change in circumstances after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, and other all the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant as seen earlier, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.