Text
The crime of forging private documents, the crime of uttering of falsified investigation documents, and the crime of fraud against the victim H on July 1, 201.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On July 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in imprisonment with labor for the crime of false entry in the authentic copy of a notarial deed at Suwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 15, 201.
[2013rd group3436] In September 2008, the Defendant newly constructed a building of 2nd and 10th class above ground (K building) on ten parcels outside the J of Sung-si in 2008, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for the building under the name of L, M, N, A,O and P, and promoted the sale project.
Around August 2009, the Defendant proposed that the victim H, who became aware of through Q, a birth village, would have been engaged in the party room business on the sixth floor of the above building, provided the party room business place and invested the facilities of the victim. The victim, who accepted the above proposal, was equipped with the party room business facilities of the above building No. 601 and No. 602 by taking over KRW 80 million from around that time to September 2009, and operated the party hall directly for about one year after completing the report on the party hall facilities under the name of the victim.
1. When the Defendant received a claim from the above victim on September 2010 to compensate for investment loss in the above party room business, the Defendant arranged the party room business and newly constructed 17 studio on the 6th floor of the above building, and suggested that the Defendant sold the above studio.
As to the proposal of the defendant, the victim demanded the return of the funds to be invested by him to the defendant, and the defendant, in order to know the victim, prepared a written contract with the purport that R, one's own person, takes over the defendant's obligation to pay money to the victim, and sentenced the victim to deliver it to the victim.
The defendant's liability of KRW 238,50,00,00, which the defendant had against the victim without the permission of the above R, at his office in S, in September 2010.