A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 16, 2017, at around 01:45, the Defendant: (a) inflicted an injury on the heat on which the number of days of treatment cannot be known, such as the victim’s assault set up against “C” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim’s injury was caused by an injury, such as the victim’s injury and the victim’s injury upon the victim’s entrance.

2. The Defendant’s interference with the performance of official duties was found to have taken place on the same date and time as the above 1.3, and at the same place as the above 1.1., and in order for F to arrest as a current criminal, the police officer of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Police Station E District F, Young-gu, Seoul, to the extent that he was arrested by the shot shot shot.

시발 새끼 이것 놔!” 라는 등의 욕설을 하면서 뒷머리로 위 F의 얼굴 부위를 들이 받는 등 폭행하여 경찰공무원의 현행범인 체포에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38 (1) 2 of the same Act concerning the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: A punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties is highly likely to be punished by a severe punishment due to an act of light of public authority and disturbing legal order: The fact that there is no record of being punished by a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties; the fact that there is no record of being punished by a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties; the fact that the degree of violence is not serious; and other conditions for sentencing indicated in the records