logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.08.11 2015고단640
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a ecoo vehicle.

On April 6, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car on April 23:40, 2015, while driving the said car, followed by one lane in front of the Fransan-gu E and the three lanes in front of the preceding two lanes, driving from the side of the department store to the distance of F.m.

At the time, vehicles waiting for signal at night and at the front time are stopped, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely operate the steering system, steering system, and brake system to prevent accidents by operating the vehicle in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the victim I (26 years old) who was waiting for the front part of the Ecoos car to the front part of the Ecoos car as it was driven by the victim G(55 years old) who was waiting for the front part of the Ecoos car, and had the victim I (26 years old) driven by the said Hasa taxi as the front part of the Ecoos car with the shocking part of the said Hasa taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, caused the victim G to inflict injury on the cryp fry, etc. in light of the crypty that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim K (50 years of age) who is a taxi passenger to inflict injury on the right side of the cryp, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim I suffered injury on the cryp, etc. which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the stalpyp taxi with the repair cost of KRW 5,353,00,000, and failed to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even if the stalpyp taxi was damaged to the 1,308,00 won of repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of I and G;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, photographs, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow