beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,767,00 for Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from January 21, 2016 to November 10, 2017; and (b) the Defendant.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) On January 21, 2016, the driver of a G car (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) driven the said vehicle on or around 13:35, and driven the 97 Y apartment distance from H at H to I apartment surface on the 5-lane of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, to turn to the left in the direction of the gate station in violation of the front-round red signal, and shocked the J-si (hereinafter referred to as “instant taxi”)’s right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand side from the left-hand side of the Defendant vehicle due to the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).
3) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C, D, and E are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for compensating for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant vehicle. C. The Defendant asserts that there was negligence on the part of Plaintiff A, but there is no evidence to recognize the limitation of liability. The Defendant does not limit the Defendant’s liability. [In the absence of a dispute over the grounds for recognition, the facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap’s evidence, Eul’s evidence, and Eul’s evidence
2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;
The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.
In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.
The plaintiff A [basic matters] case number of 2017da109466 of the case number of 2017dada109466, the name of K-term rental date of 34 years old and 28 months old at the time of the accident, 14 years old and 34 years old at the time of the accident.