1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant 1 Construction Co., Ltd. 1,143,986.

1. As a result of examining the grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance and the evidence submitted by the parties, the legitimacy of the judgment of the court of first instance is examined, and this court’s reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any dismissal or addition or supplementary determination as follows, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Parts to be used or added or supplementally determined;

A. “2. A. 1) Facts recognized” in the part “1. 1. . . . . . . the following is added to the 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance. The part concerning the defect repair expenses list is different from the amount of the judgment of the court of first instance; hereinafter the same shall apply. (Unit: Won, less than Won,

(2) 1. 1. 2. 1. 4. 1. 2. 4. 2. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 1. 2. 4. 1. 1. 2. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 1. 4. 1. 4. 1. 4. 1. 4. 4. 1. 4. 1. 2. 4. 4. 4. 1. 4. 4. 4. 1. 4. 4. 4. 4. 1. 2. 4. 4. 4. 1. 1. 2. 4. 1. 1. 5 of the 2. 2. 2. 5th 2. 4, 1964 . 1. 193 76, 7710 269, 265 31, 25 1386. 8 18. 18. 4. 1.

B. In the part “2. A. 2) Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment thereon, the contents and marks of “A” are added to the part following the first instance judgment Nos. 10 and 6. As to each of the items indicated below, it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff’s assertion was defective in light of the circumstances as indicated in the “judgment”. Thus, this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is with merit.

The summary of the plaintiff's assertion in the item is limited to 99 complexes.