logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.10 2015고단2683
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 10,000,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall make a false indication of the origin of livestock products.

From June 11, 2015 to June 14, 2015, the Defendant indicated and sold “E” operated by the Defendant located in Chungcheongnam-si, Yangsan-si, as well as 1,578.43kg, Canadian and U.S. dollars, and 692.72kg, Canadian and U.S. dollars, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each certificate and a statement of detection;

1. Each seizure report and each investigation report;

1. Application of each client’s ledger, statement of transaction and business registration certificate, each copy of each business transaction and each copy of each business registration certificate, each of the sales records (from June 11, 2015 to June 16, 2015), and each of the photographic statutes

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts and Articles 14 and 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (generally, imprisonment with labor and the concurrent imposition of fines);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] False Indication [No person [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] exists in the basic area (4 to 1 year) of types 1 (small and medium-sized type (less than 50 million won)] [decision of sentence] [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act committed the crime in this case again despite being sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for the same crime in 2012, despite being sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment, the crime in this case constitutes the crime in this case again. The crime in this case is deemed to be committed under the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the sound distribution order is harmed and the consumer's trust is weak, and the period of the crime is relatively short, and the fact that there is a relatively

arrow