1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for payment of KRW 130,771,88 and the period from August 27, 2013 to June 19, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Haotopy Co., Ltd. and the AYFsian car owned by it (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. B, around 10:30 on June 10, 2012, driving the instant vehicle and proceeding at the 1100 side of the fish embankment of the 1100 road into one lane from the Jeju-si bank, and departing from the bend and the right from the bend road to the right, and at Jeju-si, there was a traffic accident falling short of the Gu locked below nine meters at the site of the construction for the second hydroelectric power generation facilities of the fish farm reservoir at Jeju (hereinafter “the instant construction”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” Due to the instant accident, C, a passenger, died during emergency treatment, and D, E, and B suffered injury.

C. By November 14, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 135,519,400 to the deceased’s bereaved family members for medical expenses and the agreed amount, and paid KRW 191,410,320 as the name of medical expenses, etc. to D on August 26, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3 through 5, Eul evidence 1 (including documentary evidence attached with a serial number) or video, Eul's testimony and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, the above facts and the evidence revealed, Gap's evidence, Gap's evidence Nos. 6, 8, and 10, and the purport of the entire pleadings is recognized, the strong construction of the defendant corporation that performed the instant construction work and the defendant Special Self-Governing Province, the contractor of the instant construction, are likely to have been 9 meters high since adjoining the road due to the instant construction work, and there is a high level of safety measures regarding the area adjacent to the instant accident site in light of the width and shape of the road, they did not install sufficient guidance signs or install safety facilities between the road and the road. Although the occurrence of the instant accident, as pointed out by the defendants, the issue in the course of Rac operation, or the driver's license.