1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 80,000,000 and KRW 10,000 among them, from July 11, 2013 to 60,000.

1. Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of the facts recognized as identical to the above facts (the authenticity of the document is presumed to be established as the whole because there is no dispute over the part of the defendants' seal impressions. Accordingly, the defendants asserted that the plaintiff and the defendant Eul stored the defendants' seal impressions, etc. for the operation of the above company in the course of running the company F together with the defendant, and that each of the above loan certificates was forged. Then, unless the authenticity of the document is recognized as genuine, the court shall recognize the existence and content of the expression as stated in the document, unless it is clear and acceptable to deny the contents of the document. If the seal impressions written in the private document are removed by their seal impressions, it is presumed that the authenticity of the document is established as a whole, barring any special circumstance, and once the document is presumed to have been signed by the defendant 20, the presumption of the authenticity of the document as to the authenticity of the above document is presumed to have been signed by the defendant 20, 2012.