In the case of a special assault crime, each assault crime, and intimidation against victim D, the defendant is sentenced to four months of imprisonment.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., punishment of the lower court (e., each crime of assault, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective assault, etc. as indicated in the judgment of the lower court), and intimidation against victim D is too unreasonable. It is so unfair that the punishment of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant for ex officio judgment.

Since the prosecutor violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, a deadly weapon, etc.) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc.) among the facts charged against the defendant in the trial of the political party, each of the crimes is "violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, a deadly weapon, etc.)", "violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act)", "special property damage", "special violence", "special violence", "Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act", "Article 366 of the Criminal Act", "Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, "Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act", "Article 366 of the Criminal Act, "Article 261 and Article 260 (1) of the Road Traffic Act", and the remaining crimes of Violence, etc. are no longer permitted and the judgment of the court below as to revise.

3. Accordingly, the court below's decision on the ground of the above ex officio reversal is justified.