The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, a same-sex victim D, did not know well, and the victim posted F a broom dancing photograph to G on the Internet “E” in the past, and sentenced F victims to criminal punishment and the video images in which the victim took a similar act with the Defendant on the Internet to inform others of the prosecuted work.

On February 8, 2017, around Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant opened a Kakakao Stockholm room using the Defendant’s mobile phone, laid down the victim’s and the victim’s private name in his/her workplace (Kakakao Stockholm H) on a cell room, and then sent the F victim’s broom dancing photograph and “D vemthmthm its meetings.”

By transmitting the message “”, etc. from November 27, 2016 to February 28, 2017, through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim on nine occasions as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.: A judgment dismissing a victim’s non-permanent declaration of intent on May 24, 2018 (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act) after the prosecution is instituted under Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.