logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.10.31 2017고정720
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A game products-related business entity shall not promote speculation by providing free gifts, etc., and in cases of all game products used by the business of providing youth games, free gifts not exceeding 5,000 won shall be provided according to the standards prescribed by Presidential Decree, and a juvenile game providing business entity shall comply with the business hours (from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, at around 22:00 on March 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) extracted the type of “F” operated by the Defendant in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Ulsan-si; (b) provided 16 games, which are game products, to exhibit and provide 10,00 won of the consumer’s selling price by displaying and providing 16 games, which are game products; and (c) promoted speculation by providing 10,00 won of the consumer’s selling price as free gifts; and (d) on the following day, around 03:00, the Defendant violated the above F’s business hours to provide games to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. In a written statement concerning the suspect interrogation of the defendant, a statement to the effect that the defendant has conducted a business of removing a person who has extracted a punishment from the body of the defendant as free of gift, and that the defendant has conducted his/her business until three times from the new body;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel for each investigation report

1. As to the violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry through the provision of free gifts, which encourages the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel, it does not constitute a case where the given gifts in the judgment fall under a game which is relatively weak in friendlyness, and thus, is not a case where the offer of free gifts is made in the judgment, but rather a man-made race, and there is no provision of free gifts.

2. The defendant's act of offering free gifts on the following grounds (the facts or circumstances are recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court) constitutes an act of offering free gifts prohibited by the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry.

arrow