1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. C’s implementation developments 1) The Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “DP”) on June 23, 1993

(2) On March 27, 1995, 195, 200, 200, 2000, 2000 square meters and 7,000 square meters and 7,000 square meters, 200 square meters and 200 square meters and 7,000 square meters, 200 square meters and 200 square meters and 7,000 square meters and 200 square meters, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000,000,000 square meters and 7,000 square meters and 30,000 square meters and 30,00,000 and 200,000 square meters and 30,00,000,000 won and 20

3) On March 5, 2001, C was selected at the general meeting of the owners of land, etc. at the general meeting of the owners of land, etc., as the implementer of the instant project, and after obtaining authorization for the implementation of the project from the competent authority for the change, etc. of the implementer, C was notified

(2) The project site of this case is 7,052.4m2 (hereinafter “instant project site”) and 61m2,000,000,000

4) On August 12, 2002, C entered into a development project agreement on the instant project with the Si Corporation BJ (hereinafter “BJ”), trust company BI (hereinafter “BI”), loan company BK (hereinafter “BK”), etc. on the following grounds: (a) the construction of the main complex building in the name of “G” (hereinafter “instant building”) was carried out.

5) C entered into a contract for the sale of apartment units or officetels among the instant buildings with more than 200 buyers, but C was unable to pay the construction cost to BJ due to financial shortage, etc., and BJ suspended construction around May 2004 (C from October 12, 2002 to June 5, 2003).