logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.16 2017고단374
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The criminal defendant of this case is a person who is engaged in driving Bone Star Cargo.

On December 9, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 16:35, and driven the front road in the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do along the three-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane.

At the time, the Defendant, prior to the same direction, had a duty of care to secure a safe distance to avoid when the said cargo stops, on the grounds that the Defendant was followed by a 1 ton cargo vehicle of the E driving. Therefore, the Defendant had a duty of care to maintain a safe distance to avoid when the said cargo stops.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle while driving the vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle, and found the victim G (the 74 years old) who cross the vehicle in the same ton of the vehicle without permission from the right side of the vehicle (the 74 years old), and did not stop the vehicle, as it is, the Defendant’s vehicle’s front part of the 1 ton cargo vehicle of the e driving, received the rear part of the e driving vehicle, and caused the said damage to the front part of the e driving vehicle of the 1 ton cargo vehicle of the e driving due to the shock of the e driving, and caused the above damage to the e driving vehicle of the 1 ton cargo vehicle (the hereinafter the Defendant’s vehicle referred to as “Defendant’s vehicle”).

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim at the I Hospital located in Bucheon-si H around December 18, 2016 due to the foregoing occupational negligence by allowing the victim to die due to the hemical shock, etc.

2. In full view of all the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves, without any reasonable doubt, that “the victim caused the death of the victim by shocking the E vehicle, which is the vehicle running ahead of it, and thereby shocking the victim.”

It is difficult to see, and

arrow