A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 22, 2017, the Defendant committed the case in the case of the 1st intersection of North Korean Dos, the Defendant was unable to challenge the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) in the case of the 1st intersection of North Korean Dos around 09:30 on December 22, 2017, while the Defendant was investigating “the act of receiving and receiving goods from a prisoner of the same rent and the case of speculative acts” reported by the Defendant from a teacher who is a correctional official, B, who is a public official to be in charge of the investigation, of “the act of receiving and receiving goods from a prisoner of the same rent and the case of speculative acts,” he did not believe the Defendant’s horse; and (b) the Defendant was walking the door door installed in front of the two.

Therefore, teachers C, who are correctional public officials, tried to take protective outfits against the defendant, and the defendant was satisfing with his own shoulder, etc., and assaulted C's fingers, which was satfing the defendant's entrance, due to cremation.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of correctional officials on the maintenance of order in prisons.

2. On December 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime in the Class I sub-committee investigation room of the North Korean Dos; (b) committed a assault on the wall and the floor of the instant paragraph that was placed in the room for the investigation of the same correctional institution; and (c) was placed in the room due to interference with the performance of official duties, such as the description of the said paragraph 1; and (d) was placed in the wall and the floor of the relevant correctional institution; and (c) was placed in the teacher E who was a correctional public official while harming himself by breakinging his head on the wall and the floor; and (d) was spited on the face of the E face once he sawd on the part of the head of the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order in correctional officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B, C, E, and F;

1. Each police statement protocol against G, F, C, and E;

1. Each service report prepared by C, B, H, I, E, and J;

1. Written statements of the F;

1. Circumstances supporting the criminal intent of the defendant, such as photographs of damage, and the conduct of interfering with the execution of official duties;

-. 피고인이 “ 씨 발, 왜 내 말을 안 믿어 주는데 ”라고 소리치며 파티션이 기울어질 정도 세기로 책상 가림 막을 걷어찼다.

-. The defendant sits, she saw "h" sound at the bar.