beta
Text
1. Of the part concerning Defendant D and Gyeonggi-do in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following order to pay is applicable.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. At the time of 2017, Plaintiff A was an elementary school student who was enrolled in the sixth Year at K Elementary School, and Plaintiff B and C were the parents of Plaintiff A, and Defendant D and E were teachers of L Elementary Schools under the jurisdiction of Defendant Gyeonggi-do, which were located in both cities of Gyeonggi-do at the time of 2017.
B. At around 21:00 on November 3, 2017, Plaintiff A and other friendly-gu F, G, H, I, I, and J apartment elevator were on the same day. Plaintiff A and other friendly-gu were on the sixth grade of L elementary school.
C. The Defendants have directed L Elementary School Teachers of the above L Elementary School as indicated below.
Defendant D Defendant D Defendant D’s 1’s 6th 5th Ha, 2 H 3, 5, and 6’s 3F 5, 4 G 3, and 5th 5, respectively.
D. Defendant D had an interest in the students of M, who were working as L Elementary School Teachers and were living under the care of the grandparents. On November 9, 2017, Defendant D asked Ma's pro-gu G and asked Ma about M, and confirmed the details of G's mobile phone calls.
Defendant D discovered the conversations between the above I and the above I on November 8, 2017, and asked G about the reasons late at night. On November 3, 2017, G had an unexpected act against Plaintiff A with respect to the J apartment elevator, and the Plaintiff lent I mobile phone in order to criticize it.
E. During that process, Plaintiff A made a phone call to G, Defendant D received the mobile phone instead of Defendant D’s mobile phone, and then Plaintiff A came to enter the 6th grade laboratory of L Elementary School. The Plaintiff sought to find the same school-friendly N with Defendant E, and Defendant D followed the Plaintiff A’s self-determination of the elevator case for about 1 hour and 40 minutes in the status of Defendant E, the Defendant D followed the Plaintiff’s self-determination of the elevator case for about 1 hour and 40 minutes, and during that process, the Plaintiff told the Plaintiff A of a high character, “as it takes place,” or “as it might cause weather, fry, death, etc.,” and “Yadong.”